Bring: Property type; city; verified features; approved listing facts

Turn verified property facts into a concise listing description, a short version, and a factual headline. Separate missing facts from publishable copy.

Return: Description, short version, headline

Review: Check every feature, permission, measurement, and advertising requirement.

Bring: Actual tasks; people; approved launch date

Organize the supplied launch tasks into a sequence with an owner, dependency, and approval checkpoint. Do not invent dates or completed work.

Return: Launch checklist

Review: Confirm responsibilities and dates with the brokerage.

Bring: Verified property facts; approved call to action

Draft three different property-focused social post outlines: a verified feature, a practical use of space, and an invitation to ask questions.

Return: Three post drafts

Review: Avoid lifestyle assumptions, protected-class targeting, and invented amenities.

Bring: Verified features; available shots; desired next step

Write a short walkthrough script that pairs each spoken line with a shot the agent can actually film. Flag any required missing footage.

Return: Spoken script and shot list

Review: Use authorized footage; confirm every spoken property claim.

Bring: Verified listing brief; authorized photo list

Plan six carousel slides from the supplied property brief. Give each slide one factual message and a suggested visual, without inventing photos.

Return: Six-slide storyboard

Review: Do not imply a photograph depicts a feature it does not show.

Bring: Approved facts; audience permission; contact details

Draft a short listing announcement to a permission-based audience. Use one clear next step and mark unavailable facts as placeholders.

Return: Email subject and body

Review: Confirm audience consent and brokerage advertising requirements.

Bring: Actual launch plan; approved services; seller questions

Create an agenda to review the proposed marketing sequence, responsibilities, feedback collection, and approval needs with the seller.

Return: Meeting agenda

Review: Do not promise reach, timing, sale price, or results.

Bring: Draft copy; approved source facts

Audit the supplied listing draft against the supplied source facts. List unsupported, ambiguous, or conflicting claims without silently correcting them.

Return: Claim/source/review table

Review: The agent must independently resolve each flagged claim.

Bring: Authorized anonymized feedback; dates

Summarize anonymized showing feedback into observations, repeated questions, and items needing verification. Separate comments from conclusions.

Return: Neutral recap

Review: Do not treat visitor comments as a valuation or representative survey.

Bring: Approved new price; effective date; channels

Prepare a seller-review communication plan for an already approved price change. Do not recommend a price or imply market response.

Return: Communication checklist and draft

Review: Confirm authorization, price, timing, and required record updates.

Bring: Verified Q&A; appropriate verification contacts

Create a short FAQ using only the supplied verified answers. Leave unknowns explicitly unanswered and identify who should verify them.

Return: FAQ with unresolved questions

Review: Do not infer rental rights, insurance, permits, or zoning.

Bring: Actual task record; original plan; authorized metrics

Compare the actual completed launch tasks with the original plan. Identify missing evidence and one process experiment, without claiming causation.

Return: Debrief and one experiment

Review: Distinguish incomplete records, observations, and measured outcomes.

Bring: Buyer questions without identifying details; approved process

Build a welcoming first-meeting agenda covering the process, questions, available support, and topics requiring broker-approved explanations.

Return: Meeting agenda

Review: Do not draft or interpret a binding representation agreement.

Bring: General search brief; known questions

Create neutral questions about property needs, budget discussion with an appropriate lender, timing, and decision criteria.

Return: Tour preparation questions

Review: Do not use protected characteristics or steer toward neighborhoods.

Bring: Experience level; approved process; practice goal

Role-play a buyer consultation one question at a time. Wait for my reply, then give feedback on clarity and questions I should refer to my broker.

Return: Interactive rehearsal

Review: This is practice, not an actual client interaction or legal advice.

Bring: General financing questions; approved referral process

Prepare a neutral checklist of information a buyer may want to ask an appropriately licensed lender. Do not calculate eligibility or recommend loan terms.

Return: Questions and handoff checklist

Review: A lender must verify financing, payments, qualification, and disclosures.

Bring: Verified facts for each property; buyer-stated criteria

Build a comparison worksheet using the supplied verified facts. Leave opinions and unknowns separate rather than ranking communities.

Return: Comparison worksheet

Review: No safety, school-quality, demographic, or protected-class assumptions.

Bring: Non-identifying report observations; professional contacts

Organize the supplied authorized, de-identified inspection observations into questions for the inspector and responsible professionals.

Return: Question list

Review: Do not diagnose defects, estimate repairs, or give legal advice.

Bring: Buyer questions; broker-approved process

Prepare a conversation checklist about the buyer decision, available verified information, and items the broker must explain.

Return: Conversation checklist

Review: No contract terms, legal conclusions, or negotiation guarantees.

Bring: Approved process; actual milestones

Describe the supplied brokerage-approved purchase process in plain language, marking steps whose timing depends on other parties.

Return: Process map

Review: Never invent contract deadlines or present a general timeline as binding.

Bring: Authorized contact context; buyer comments; approved next step

Draft a permission-based follow-up asking what the buyer noticed and what needs clarification. Do not pressure a decision.

Return: Short message draft

Review: Verify contact permission and avoid manufactured urgency.

Bring: Approved explanation; practice question

Rehearse responding to a general representation question using my broker-approved explanation, then list points that require a licensed professional.

Return: Practice answer and referral points

Review: Do not invent fees, obligations, contract language, or legal rights.

Bring: Actual questions; confirmed contacts

Organize supplied closing questions by the appropriate professional: lender, title/closing team, broker, or another confirmed contact.

Return: Question routing sheet

Review: The responsible professional must verify figures, dates, and instructions.

Bring: Authorized anonymized feedback; actual service process

Turn permission-based, anonymized client feedback into a process review. Separate what was said from my interpretation.

Return: Service review

Review: Do not invent a testimonial or publish identifying client information.

Bring: Non-identifying seller context; approved meeting purpose

Create open questions about a seller goals, property information, timing, and concerns without assuming motivation or urgency.

Return: Discovery questions

Review: Avoid pressure, valuation claims, or inferred financial hardship.

Bring: Approved services; practice goal

Play a thoughtful seller asking one question at a time about my proposed process. Give feedback on clarity and unsupported promises.

Return: Interactive rehearsal

Review: Do not invent marketing capabilities, experience, or past results.

Bring: Approved document list; verification contacts

Draft a concise request for verified property facts and documents, with sensitive records sent only through an approved secure process.

Return: Request draft

Review: Do not ask clients to paste private financial or identity documents into AI.

Bring: Authorized preparation list; constraints

Organize seller-supplied preparation ideas by effort, dependency, and items that need professional advice. Do not predict return on spending.

Return: Priority worksheet

Review: No repair-cost, value-increase, or sale-price promises.

Bring: Actual shoot plan; authorized spaces; photo permissions

Draft a practical photo-day checklist from the supplied property access and photography plan. Identify privacy and permission checks.

Return: Preparation checklist

Review: Protect personal information and respect occupied-property access rules.

Bring: Actual actions; verified metrics; authorized feedback

Draft a factual update from actual completed actions, authorized metrics, feedback, and unresolved questions.

Return: Seller update

Review: Do not invent impressions, leads, showings, or buyer interest.

Bring: Broker-approved process; verified data summary

Role-play a seller asking how pricing decisions are supported. Ask me to explain verified comparable data and when broker review is needed.

Return: Practice conversation

Review: No automated valuation or promise that any price will produce an offer.

Bring: De-identified offer questions; approved process

Prepare an agenda for a broker-supported seller discussion about received offers. Use supplied authorized summaries without making a recommendation.

Return: Meeting agenda

Review: No legal interpretation, protected-class preferences, or invented terms.

Bring: Actual proposed assets; approval process

Create a signoff worksheet for property facts, photo permissions, proposed copy, channels, and the responsible approver.

Return: Approval worksheet

Review: A worksheet is not a substitute for required authorization or contracts.

Bring: Actual listing history; authorized feedback

Prepare neutral questions to review a stalled listing using actual actions, facts, and feedback. Separate evidence gaps from hypotheses.

Return: Relaunch discussion questions

Review: Do not diagnose the market or promise a relaunch result.

Bring: Approved resource categories; verified contact details

Outline a generic moving-resource sheet with placeholders for independently verified contacts and useful questions.

Return: Handout outline

Review: Do not imply endorsement, availability, pricing, or undisclosed referral arrangements.

Bring: Actual service record; permitted feedback

Review the supplied actual service record and anonymized feedback to identify one clearer communication habit for the next listing.

Return: Debrief and next habit

Review: Do not turn private feedback into a public testimonial without permission.

Bring: Topic; market; dated source facts; approved next step

Turn one verified local real estate question into a video outline, carousel outline, email draft, and social caption using the same source facts.

Return: Four-format draft set

Review: No invented local statistics, advice, or automatic publishing.

Bring: Topic; intended audience by need; available sources

Plan seven different educational posts around one approved topic. For each, identify the factual input and the question it helps answer.

Return: Seven-post plan

Review: Do not target protected characteristics or promise engagement.

Bring: Verified teaching points; source dates; desired length

Write a short spoken outline with a plain-language hook, three verified teaching points, and a non-pressuring next step.

Return: Video outline

Review: Avoid legal, tax, lending, or valuation advice.

Bring: Verified figures; dates; geography; definitions

Draft a market-note structure from supplied dated, comparable figures. State scope, source, and limitations beside each observation.

Return: Market-note draft

Review: Do not invent statistics or generalize beyond the supplied sample.

Bring: Question; verified answer; source

Plan five slides answering one question. Use one useful message per slide, a source note, and a question to discuss with a professional.

Return: Five-slide outline

Review: Keep unsupported claims and individualized advice out.

Bring: Approved topic; verified sources; contact permission

Draft a concise educational newsletter for an audience authorized to receive it. Separate useful education from a clearly optional invitation.

Return: Email subject and draft

Review: Review consent, advertising identification, and any required opt-out process.

Bring: Professional role; permitted topic; interview purpose

Prepare interview questions for a verified local professional and an approval checklist for quoting their answers.

Return: Interview questions

Review: Obtain permission and verify credentials; do not imply an endorsement.

Bring: Approved non-sensitive transcript; next step

Turn my approved transcript into three concise caption drafts that accurately reflect what the video says.

Return: Three captions

Review: Do not add unsupported claims or quotes not in the recording.

Bring: Actual content process; channels

Build a repeatable content brief containing audience need, source facts, permissions, review owner, format, and next step.

Return: Editorial brief template

Review: Keep private client information and protected-class targeting out.

Bring: Draft; authorized sources

Extract every factual claim in the draft and pair it with a supplied source or an explicit verification task.

Return: Claim verification ledger

Review: An AI check is not evidence that a claim is true.

Bring: Owned or licensed source content; channels

Suggest distinct educational uses for one approved article or video. Identify what new factual input each adaptation would need.

Return: Repurposing plan

Review: Respect copyright and do not reproduce third-party content without rights.

Bring: Actual baseline; channel; available measurement

Design a modest content-process experiment with a clear hypothesis, actual baseline, measurement window, and review step.

Return: Experiment plan

Review: No outcome promises; correlation does not establish causation.

Bring: Actual inquiry; approved contact channel; permission

Draft an introduction for someone who expressly asked to hear from me. State the context, answer their request, and offer one optional next step.

Return: Message draft

Review: Do not infer consent from a purchased list or public contact information.

Bring: De-identified inquiry; verified response facts

Draft a concise response to the actual question received. Identify missing facts instead of assuming the person is ready to transact.

Return: Reply draft

Review: Confirm recipient permission and facts before sending.

Bring: Permitted relationship context; approved next step

Write a low-pressure check-in to an existing contact where outreach is authorized. Include a simple way to decline further contact.

Return: Check-in draft

Review: Confirm applicable consent and contact rules; do not send automatically.

Bring: Authorized event context; requested resource

Draft a follow-up for an attendee who requested information at an event. Refer only to the topics they authorized me to discuss.

Return: Follow-up draft

Review: Do not imply attendance alone permits marketing.

Bring: Consent from both parties; verified professional information

Prepare a draft introduction between consenting parties using verified roles and contact information. List required agreement checks separately.

Return: Introduction draft and checks

Review: No automatic referral agreement, disclosure, endorsement, or outcome promise.

Bring: Permitted context; verified resource

Draft a useful resource note for a past client authorized to receive it, with no assumption about their finances or plans.

Return: Resource-note draft

Review: No inferred life event or sensitive personal information.

Bring: Approved process; communication permissions

Map an approved follow-up process into if/then steps that respect consent, actual responses, and a stop condition.

Return: Decision tree

Review: Do not create an automated campaign or override contact preferences.

Bring: Actual contribution; approved channel

Draft a specific thank-you for a real introduction or permitted conversation. Do not imply a transaction or obligation.

Return: Thank-you draft

Review: Verify names and context; do not promise compensation or gifts.

Bring: Approved field definitions; de-identified examples

Create a read-only checklist for reviewing authorized CRM records for duplicates, missing permission evidence, and stale notes.

Return: Cleanup checklist

Review: No record edits, enrichment, scraping, or outreach without approval.

Bring: Actual response; permission context

Draft a respectful reply accepting that someone is not ready, asking whether any future contact is welcome without pressure.

Return: Reply draft

Review: Honor a request to stop; do not manufacture urgency.

Bring: General scenario; practice objective

Role-play a skeptical but respectful contact, one turn at a time. Coach me to ask permission and avoid assumptions.

Return: Interactive rehearsal

Review: No deception, pressure tactics, or invented relationship history.

Bring: Authorized log; actual promised actions

Review an authorized, de-identified follow-up log for promised actions and unresolved questions. Separate actual commitments from suggestions.

Return: Follow-through checklist

Review: Do not invent completed outreach or evaluate people using protected traits.

Bring: Actual event details; verified property facts

Organize the supplied approved event plan into preparation, event-day, and follow-up tasks with permissions and responsible people.

Return: Three-stage checklist

Review: Verify listing permission, access, signage, brokerage rules, and dates.

Bring: Verified event facts; approved contact details

Write a factual open-house announcement using only the supplied approved time, location, and property details.

Return: Announcement draft

Review: Never invent an event date, availability, or property claim.

Bring: Verified property facts; approved host process

Play a visitor with general property questions, asking one at a time. Coach me to be useful, factual, and respectful of privacy.

Return: Interactive rehearsal

Review: No assumptions about visitor eligibility, family status, or motivation.

Bring: Verified property information; approved process

Create a neutral question sheet that helps visitors ask about the property and the buying process without disclosing sensitive information.

Return: Question sheet

Review: Do not solicit financial documents, protected traits, or unnecessary personal details.

Bring: Approved listing brief; photo rights; contact block

Build a one-page handout from verified listing facts, approved photos, sources, and contact information. Mark unknown details.

Return: Handout outline

Review: Check all claims and brokerage identification before use.

Bring: Approved collection purpose; brokerage/privacy requirements

Outline the minimal fields and clear choices an event form should have for resource requests versus optional future contact.

Return: Form specification

Review: Do not imply legal compliance; confirm wording with appropriate reviewers.

Bring: Approved event details; verified features; authorized footage

Draft an event invitation script with actual event facts and a simple property-focused shot list.

Return: Script and shot list

Review: No neighborhood steering, fabricated urgency, or guaranteed outcomes.

Bring: Actual plan; emergency and broker contacts

Create a practical list of questions for access issues, cancellations, weather, and visitor concerns based on the approved event plan.

Return: Contingency checklist

Review: Use verified emergency procedures; no invented safety guidance.

Bring: Actual counts; approved notes; dates

Summarize actual event activity and authorized anonymized feedback for a seller update. Label missing information.

Return: Event recap

Review: Do not inflate attendance, leads, buyer interest, or conversions.

Bring: Actual request; resource link; permission

Draft a follow-up delivering only the resource a visitor requested, with an optional next step that respects their stated preference.

Return: Follow-up draft

Review: Do not treat a resource request as blanket marketing consent.

Bring: Actual task record; approved plan

Compare the actual event tasks with the plan and propose one change to test next time.

Return: Process debrief

Review: Do not infer causation or claim business results from attendance alone.

Bring: Approved topic; verified sources; guest permissions

Outline a short educational event using verified sources and appropriate licensed guest roles, with no implied endorsement.

Return: Event outline

Review: Verify permits, permissions, disclosures, and the limits of each speaker role.

Bring: Non-sensitive task list; actual deadlines

Organize my supplied authorized task list into commitments, overdue items, questions, and proposed priorities. Do not change records.

Return: Review brief

Review: Verify deadlines with authoritative records and responsible professionals.

Bring: Authorized notes; meeting purpose

Turn approved non-sensitive meeting notes into an agenda with decisions needed, owners to confirm, and missing inputs.

Return: Agenda

Review: Do not invent decisions, commitments, or attendance.

Bring: Actual approved process

Turn a supplied approved process into a clear checklist with owner, input, evidence, and review checkpoints.

Return: Operating checklist

Review: Broker review is required for transaction or compliance procedures.

Bring: Approved task context; permitted records

Prepare a handoff template showing the actual work state, authorized files, unresolved questions, and agreed next action.

Return: Handoff brief

Review: Do not disclose client data or grant access without authorization.

Bring: Authorized document names and dates

Create an inventory of supplied document titles, versions, and verification contacts. Flag missing information without interpreting legal content.

Return: Inventory

Review: Use approved storage; no legal opinion or automatic completeness certification.

Bring: Non-sensitive process description; actual observations

Ask me one question at a time to map a workflow bottleneck, distinguishing observed delays from assumptions.

Return: Guided process interview

Review: Do not invent measurements or diagnose people performance.

Bring: Verified vendor information; actual needs

Create a neutral comparison worksheet for proposed tools using actual requirements, verified pricing, permissions, and support information.

Return: Comparison worksheet

Review: Do not invent integrations, included subscriptions, or savings.

Bring: Approved systems list; fact categories

Map which authorized system or professional should verify each fact in my workflow. Identify conflicting copies as unresolved.

Return: Source map

Review: A tool label is not proof of access, accuracy, or authority.

Bring: Proposed workflow; actual capabilities; policy requirements

Draft approval gates for a proposed AI workflow: allowed data, read-only start, preview, human approval, audit, and stop conditions.

Return: Approval checklist

Review: A prompt does not create a working integration or a compliance guarantee.

Bring: Non-sensitive confirmed events; preparation needs

Organize actual upcoming events and confirmed commitments into a proposed preparation list. Do not schedule or send anything.

Return: Preparation brief

Review: Verify times and time zones; no invented reservations or contract deadlines.

Bring: Authorized field definitions; reporting scope

Define the supplied business metrics using actual system definitions, time periods, and known limitations.

Return: Metrics glossary

Review: Do not invent figures, infer causation, or expose private production data.

Bring: Authorized process record; actual measurements

Review actual process changes, measured observations, and unresolved issues. Recommend one modest experiment with explicit assumptions.

Return: Quarterly review

Review: No guaranteed improvement, performance ranking, or unsupported financial claim.

Bring: Experience level; time available; approved onboarding tasks

Create a realistic learning plan around my available time, verified onboarding tasks, and questions for the assigned broker or mentor.

Return: Four-week plan

Review: Do not invent mentorship assignment, training access, or licensing credit.

Bring: Chosen skill; experience level; approved references

Design a short practice sequence for one skill using rehearsal, feedback, and a real-person review before client use.

Return: Practice sequence

Review: Practice is not professional qualification or supervision.

Bring: Learning goal; actual course information

Create criteria for choosing courses that address my stated learning gap. Use only supplied verified course details and mark approval status unknown.

Return: Course comparison brief

Review: Do not claim availability, certification, included access, or CE credit without proof.

Bring: Experience; general market; support needs

Draft neutral questions about supervision, support, onboarding, costs to verify privately, technology, and local formal mentorship.

Return: Interview questions

Review: Do not invent brokerage terms or imply a sponsor is the supervising broker.

Bring: Confirmed role; approved questions

Prepare questions and an agenda for my actual assigned mentor or broker, using de-identified practice issues.

Return: Meeting sheet

Review: Do not assume a formal mentor exists or replace transaction supervision.

Bring: Actual goals; time; existing commitments

Turn my goals into a small proposed weekly board with one learning action, one practice action, and one authorized follow-through action.

Return: Action board

Review: Do not promise leads, revenue, or a result within the week.

Bring: Practice topic; actual notes

Create prompts to reflect on one actual practice session: what happened, what I learned, what needs review, and the next exercise.

Return: Reflection worksheet

Review: Do not turn a simulation into a testimonial or business outcome.

Bring: Verified idea; permissions; actual baseline

Convert one approved training idea into a small experiment with prerequisites, actual baseline, review date, and stop conditions.

Return: Experiment brief

Review: No automatic execution or guarantee that the idea will work.

Bring: Time available; approved topics; actual channels

Build a sustainable content habit around available time and verified sources, with preparation, review, and optional publishing steps.

Return: Habit plan

Review: No audience-growth or engagement promises.

Bring: Self-assessment; actual goals

Map my self-reported experience into practice priorities and questions for a qualified coach, without declaring competence or credentials.

Return: Skills-practice map

Review: No credential, supervision, or performance assessment is implied.

Bring: Owned or permitted resource summary; learning goal

Turn a permitted summary of a learning resource into one action to consider, one question to verify, and one way to review the attempt.

Return: Action worksheet

Review: Respect copyright and verify advice with the appropriate professional.

Bring: Actual completed tasks; original plan; authorized measurements

Review my actual completed actions and notes against my original plan. Separate activity, learning, and any genuinely measured outcomes.

Return: Review and next-step plan

Review: Do not infer client results or causation from activity counts.

Bring: Owned writing samples; communication purpose

Study my own permitted writing samples and propose a concise style guide covering tone, sentence length, preferred words, and phrases to avoid.

Return: Voice guide

Review: Do not imitate a living writer or claim the output is indistinguishable from a human.

Bring: Approved draft; source facts; required disclosures

Rewrite the supplied approved draft into plain language while preserving verified facts, uncertainty, and required disclosures.

Return: Revised draft plus change notes

Review: Do not remove limitations or add unsupported details.

Bring: Approved text; length limit

Create a short version of the supplied approved text and list which details were omitted so I can decide whether it remains accurate.

Return: Short draft and omissions list

Review: Keep necessary disclosures and important qualifications.

Bring: De-identified draft; actual context

Rewrite an authorized, de-identified reply to be helpful and direct without implying a relationship or promise that does not exist.

Return: Reply draft

Review: No invented history, credentials, urgency, or commitments.

Bring: Draft; actual supporting evidence

Identify places where a draft sounds more certain than the evidence supports. Suggest questions or qualified wording for human review.

Return: Uncertainty review

Review: Qualified wording does not make an unsupported claim acceptable.

Bring: Approved text; actual image descriptions

Suggest clearer headings, descriptive links, plain-language labels, and image-description drafts based on supplied actual visuals.

Return: Accessibility suggestions

Review: This is not a technical accessibility audit or compliance certification.

Bring: Approved disclosure text; draft

Compare my required approved disclosure text with the draft and flag missing or changed wording without rewriting legal language.

Return: Comparison report

Review: Have the responsible broker or professional confirm requirements.

Bring: Draft; factual context

Flag wording that may make assumptions about people, protected characteristics, neighborhood suitability, or financial circumstances.

Return: Review questions and alternative wording

Review: Human fair-housing and advertising review remains necessary.

Bring: Question; authorized verified sources

Outline an answer using only the supplied verified sources. Attach the relevant source to each point and label unresolved questions.

Return: Source-linked outline

Review: An AI citation can be wrong; open and verify each source.

Bring: My prompt; actual task

Review my prompt and ask for the missing inputs before drafting. Separate facts I supplied from assumptions the model would otherwise make.

Return: Questions and repaired prompt

Review: Do not fabricate missing inputs to make the prompt look complete.

Bring: Draft; channel; approved review process

Create a review checklist for the supplied draft covering facts, rights, privacy, consent, brokerage identification, disclosures, and a human signoff.

Return: Publishing checklist

Review: A checklist is not legal approval or permission to publish.

Bring: Two approved drafts; intended use

Compare two supplied drafts using clarity, factual support, relevance, and required limitations. Explain tradeoffs without scoring business results.

Return: Comparison and suggested edits

Review: Do not claim better conversion, human authenticity, or guaranteed performance.